Donations
|
If you wish to make a donation you can by clicking the image below.
|
|
|
17th June, 2004, 02:14 AM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
Removed all Security
WTF is going on??/
I insatalled 3236 on my server last Sunday,
Set UTSecure to log only cause i knew the md5's would be a problem
Peep's upgrade to 3236 this week and keep getting disconnected from my server, so i removed UTSecure and everything is fine now,
What is going on
Mad, Confused, Pissed...U all get the drift
Last edited by Brando67 : 17th June, 2004 at 02:56 AM.
Reason: added more info
|
17th June, 2004, 01:43 PM
|
|
UTAN Admin
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 834
|
|
*cough* Get AntiTCC *cough*
|
17th June, 2004, 02:31 PM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
yeah but i hear Wormbo isn't gonna be updating AntiTcc anytime soon
And what about the master server security stuff,
doesn't it need UTSecure to work??
|
17th June, 2004, 03:01 PM
|
|
UTAN Admin
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 834
|
|
Nope, i've have used AntiTCC since it came out and it's never given me any trouble and it has no issues at the moment. The only problem is you can't use the Full MD5 checks at the moment because it hasn't got the latest MD5's programmed into it, but that's not a problem as you can simple just disable it.
|
17th June, 2004, 03:15 PM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
Well can't one generate the full MD5 for the packages using UCC
and Could you possibly explain to me exactly how to use the ucc cmdlet ?
I really have no clue how to do tis,
Joe Wilcox told me to Find the MD5's for UTSecure using Ucc...
But I have no clue how to run ucc to create the md5 for a package??
Thanks for your help Cruicky
I have d/l AntiTcc 1.15a
How much is it going to affect security if one can't use the full md5 checks?
As I said joe told me I could create my own and add them to UTsecure??
Okay i've been reading over the .txt from 1.14 and 1.15a
I run my server a s aPublic and Clan Match server,
What settings am i gonna wanna run on the server then?
Also I take it all i have to do is run through all the check's and change them to quick rather then full?
Brandon
Last edited by Brando67 : 17th June, 2004 at 04:26 PM.
Reason: More Questions
|
17th June, 2004, 05:30 PM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
Okay
I'm now switchin to AntiTcc1
thank-You Wormbo!
My regards
Brando`
|
17th June, 2004, 09:58 PM
|
|
Rampage
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
|
|
Hi !
Since 2 days i have desabled the full md5 scan and desactivated the kick option by security. I only log transgresions.
Everythings is fine now, patched clients are no more kicked out.
Phoenix,
Belgium.
"owner of a public server powered by gameservers.nl"
|
17th June, 2004, 10:00 PM
|
|
Rampage
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
|
|
Ha yes.... i use AntiTTC 1.15a.
|
18th June, 2004, 01:36 AM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
I give up
My server runs like shit now
Lag galore
had virtually no lag with UTsecure :/
|
18th June, 2004, 11:46 AM
|
|
Rampage
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
|
|
Thanks Wormbo..
I have patched my config with the hardcoded new md5 list you provided to us
in an another tread and all seams to go right now.
I wander if i must activate again the kick thing in place of log only thing.
Brando, i will investigate for the lag thing.
Phoenix.
|
18th June, 2004, 04:54 PM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
heh Seam Holm spent an hour helpin me out last nite
Hat's off to Sean...... Many thanks
So i was able to add all the 3236 MD5's that i need I think to my UTSecure.
He also told me exactly what to do to get rid of the lag from AntiTcc,
So now that I have UTSecure running for all versions, I shall try AntiTcc again! I will post my results when I have completed this, as I have to add all MD5's for all 3 versions to Antitcc!
Right now I have virtually no lag with UTSecure!
|
26th June, 2004, 09:16 PM
|
|
Dominating
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 113
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brando67
I give up
My server runs like shit now
Lag galore
had virtually no lag with UTsecure :/
|
Yep, that's a problem of AnitTCC, it creates lag on the server.
|
27th June, 2004, 01:16 AM
|
|
Administrator/UTAN Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: /home/limited/
Posts: 1,240
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacky
Yep, that's a problem of AnitTCC, it creates lag on the server.
|
Not if you set it up correctly, ie. not running the league server setup on public servers
__________________
All views in the above post are that of the poster and not that of UTAN, unless otherwise stated
When you kill 6 people in Unreal Tournament it's a "Monster Kill", in Quake3 it's "Excellent", and in Counter-Strike it's "Kick Banned"
|
27th June, 2004, 10:48 AM
|
|
Rampage
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
|
|
So there is no sense to turn on the detection of aimbots or skin hack on a public
invasion server ? Full md5 & disalowed classes or packages are part of the leage
setup.
Phoenix.
|
27th June, 2004, 01:02 PM
|
|
out of order
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,383
|
|
There is no point in turning on "Log Client Classes/Packages" on public servers. (Check Client Classes is still usefull though and enabled by default.)
|
27th June, 2004, 02:17 PM
|
|
Rampage
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
|
|
Ok thx wormbo. I don't log clients classes or packages, i just check them.
Checking if some aimbot package are present on the client can cause lag ?
Phoenix.
|
27th June, 2004, 02:53 PM
|
|
out of order
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,383
|
|
The amount of lag that check generates depends on the number of players on the server, the server's and players' bandwidth and NetSpeed. Generally the "Check Client Classes" option should be considered the best weapon against most public bots, so better think twice before disabling it.
|
27th June, 2004, 04:08 PM
|
|
Rampage
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 57
|
|
Ok i think that too, thanks a lot.
Phoenix.
|
28th June, 2004, 01:48 AM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
I imagine this is exactly what it says...
Anti TCC integrity violation: Forged Player ID 00000000000000000000000000000000
|
29th June, 2004, 12:53 AM
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 558
|
|
K
I'm putting UTSecure back On!
AntiTcc is great Info is Awesome.....
I hate the lag............
UTSecure is simple....no detailed info suc's,
But it werk's......
And hardly any lag.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|