Donations
|
If you wish to make a donation you can by clicking the image below.
|
|
|
|
|
11th August, 2004, 11:25 PM
|
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,029
|
|
If only you could make anticheat protection an open source project . You'd have hundreds of people working on it around the clock. Of course, that wouldn't be practical as the cheat coders would have access to the project.
__________________
How to feck up a perfectly good game:
UT (1999) = UnbelievableGameSoCoolIMustHelpBringNewPlayers Tournament
UT (2008) = Unreal ThrustMyPrivatePartsInYourFaceBish
And that's probably why UTIII was a relative flop. New game, same sh*thead players ^^.
|
12th August, 2004, 03:08 AM
|
Forum Newcomer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4
|
|
oops did i post a link.. fark.. me bad.. sorry
OK ok call me id10t .. alrighty then..
so im in.. whats happening.. looking towards elfing their ass off..
|
12th August, 2004, 04:28 PM
|
Forum Newcomer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4
|
|
Ok, nothing yet but I see the wine version is avail.
Personally I'd rather forget about wine.. I drink it enuf.
Any updates, anything I can do to assist in getting the bird to fly?
|
12th August, 2004, 07:28 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ghent (Belgium)
Posts: 1,380
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fearless
If only you could make anticheat protection an open source project . You'd have hundreds of people working on it around the clock. Of course, that wouldn't be practical as the cheat coders would have access to the project.
|
apache is opensource too, iis is not. Apache is secure, iis is not
|
13th August, 2004, 10:10 AM
|
|
Holy Shit!!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,157
|
|
There was a research to find out what is more secure, comercial MySQL or OpenSource MySQL. To everyones' suprise the second.
btw. I think that if the wisdom how to do native coding on linux would get into the wrong hands we would have new undetectable cheat runned from root secured memory.(anticheat won't be able to detect it)
|
14th August, 2004, 03:22 AM
|
Forum Newcomer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11
|
|
The best thing to do right now is help out the guys of unreality clan get nooseb ported over to Linux,so we can stop the helios 2.7 bot.Right now it gets thru every anti-cheat on the net for linux. Win32 servers can stop it with nooseb.but it wont run on a linux box.
|
14th August, 2004, 08:46 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ghent (Belgium)
Posts: 1,380
|
|
There might be a temporary solution to make noose linux compatible
|
14th August, 2004, 01:13 PM
|
Unstoppable
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 235
|
|
as robus told the 150+ peeps last night helios hook 2.7 can pass noose1b . not repeating what was said but porting noos1b over to linux is a waste of time. better to wait for a new version first.
|
14th August, 2004, 02:58 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ghent (Belgium)
Posts: 1,380
|
|
idd, atm it's impossible to port to linux without making a so file anyway
|
14th August, 2004, 06:33 PM
|
Forum Newcomer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuFF$@iD
as robus told the 150+ peeps last night helios hook 2.7 can pass noose1b . not repeating what was said but porting noos1b over to linux is a waste of time. better to wait for a new version first.
|
No,if you run qval in conjuction with nooseb and modify the qval to validate the nooseb package.It will detect and kick the 2.7 bot.Unreality clan has tested this and it does stop it. As helios inlcuded a hacked noose file,if you match that one against the server version you will get kicked if it is the helios version.
|
14th August, 2004, 06:48 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,408
|
|
You don't need a hacked noose to bypass it anymore, nor will qvalidate help.
|
15th August, 2004, 12:33 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ghent (Belgium)
Posts: 1,380
|
|
you don't even need to hack it to bypass it...
|
15th August, 2004, 06:24 PM
|
Unstoppable
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 235
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by [AGA]Oxide
No,if you run qval in conjuction with nooseb and modify the qval to validate the nooseb package.It will detect and kick the 2.7 bot.Unreality clan has tested this and it does stop it. As helios inlcuded a hacked noose file,if you match that one against the server version you will get kicked if it is the helios version.
|
Read the post again i made.
2.7 passes noose1b if you know how and it needs no hacked files as stated in previos posts above. i wouldent be supprised if helios hasent found a way past the qval md5 check either. time will tell i guess.
Prods UTPG wake up ffs.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|