Donations
|
If you wish to make a donation you can by clicking the image below.
|
|
|
15th August, 2005, 12:21 AM
|
Godlike
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 426
|
|
Username / PW Hash Feature
Cruicky,
Team Warfare Ladder is mandating SafeGame by 8/21/2005, but in addition, they want UTAN to be loaded with their TWL username and PW Hash. Can you give us an option in UTAN to store multiple or at least two Usernames and Passwords, so we can easily choose which to load, such as just prior to a match. I certainly am not interested in leaving their username and password on my servers all the time.
Along those lines, it would be nice to be able to add multiple usernames and passwords at one time. That way, one could have their account loaded and our own personal accounts loaded, plus any other admins we feel that we would like to load.
Is either of those two possible?
Thanks........
Warped_Out
|
15th August, 2005, 09:00 AM
|
|
out of order
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,383
|
|
Heh, I knew it:
Quote:
[13:15:28] <@Wormbo> oh, I just had a nice idea for a UTPlus extension...
[13:15:56] <@Wormbo> some leagues like ClanBase use UTAN to enforce blacklists, right?
[13:17:05] <@Wormbo> I could write a plugin that reads a list of GUIDs maintained on a remote server
[13:17:25] <[SuK|g42]Psycho> and ban players via UTP?
[13:17:28] <@Wormbo> that might sound a bit redundant to UTAN, but it allows admins to keep two separate lists
[13:18:13] <@Wormbo> one of the regular server usage and one with the blacklisted (i.e. league-banned) GUIDs
|
|
15th August, 2005, 11:39 AM
|
|
Unstoppable
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 197
|
|
something like the AntiTCC configuration profiles.
Code:
UT2004\System\UTPlusServerSettings.ini (dunno if UTPlusServer uses an external file like the client "UTPlusClientSettings.ini" ?!?)
[UTPlus BanSettings]
CurrentProfile=League
[Clan UTANSettings]
UTANUserName=ClanAdmin
UTANPassHash=xxx
[League UTANSettings]
UTANUserName=LeagueAdmin
UTANPassHash=xxx
UT2004\System\UTPlusUTANBans.ini (File to store the bans)
[Clan UTANSettings]
BanInfo=(BanID=xxxx,BanType="Server",BanGUID="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",BanIP="a.b.c.d")
BanInfo=(BanID=xxxx,BanType="Server",BanGUID="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",BanIP="a.b.c.d")
[League UTANSettings]
BanInfo=(BanID=xxxx,BanType="Server",BanGUID="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",BanIP="a.b.c.d")
BanInfo=(BanID=xxxx,BanType="Server",BanGUID="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",BanIP="a.b.c.d")
Epic map vote:
Code:
GameConfig=(GameClass="XGame.xTeamGame",Prefix="DM",Acronym="DM",GameName="League 4on4",Mutators="...",Options="MaxPlayers=4?.....?AntiTCCSettings=League?UTPlusBanSettings=League")
Code:
GameConfig=(GameClass="XGame.xTeamGame",Prefix="DM",Acronym="DM",GameName="Train 4on4",Mutators="...",Options="MaxPlayers=4?.....?AntiTCCSettings=Train?UTPlusBanSettings=Clan")
|
15th August, 2005, 04:53 PM
|
Godlike
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 426
|
|
Only problem with this is that adding an additional mutator could be protested by an opposing team, unless that mutator was listed by the ladder as acceptable.
Working this into the UTAN mutator though, which is accepted by all, would be the best solution.
|
20th August, 2005, 11:23 AM
|
|
UTAN Admin
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 834
|
|
Maybe after I've finished the next SafeGame.
|
20th August, 2005, 06:43 PM
|
Godlike
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 426
|
|
Appreciate the consideration, Cruicky. Thanks...........
|
10th November, 2005, 08:23 PM
|
|
Killing Spree
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ETG #clanci
Posts: 30
|
|
A few clan leaders were recently discussing something like this.
We were thinking that a clan-centric coalition to combat botters would be nifty. Here's what we were thinking:
Create a group of server admins on UTAN. Each server admin can submit a ban into the group's blacklist. Whenever the blacklist is updated, all of the servers in that group receive the same blacklist. This way, we can all have a way to contribute.
As it stands, relying on the leagues to keep up with this can be cumbersome both to the league admins & the clans themselves as they wait on the leagues to ban or not ban. This way, we can react in real-time to situtations as they arise.
Not sure if this is possible already, or if there's any implications we haven't thought of yet.
__________________
|
10th November, 2005, 11:06 PM
|
Killing Spree
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 41
|
|
I, personally, would NEVER support something like this. Too easy to abuse. And I'm a clan admin, server admin, and a ladder admin.
|
14th November, 2005, 09:10 PM
|
|
Killing Spree
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ETG #clanci
Posts: 30
|
|
After thinking more about my post, I think Warped_Out's system would work better. If I was able to add multiple account/password hashes, I could add the server bans of other admins I trust.
__________________
|
14th November, 2005, 09:32 PM
|
Dominating
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 141
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scumgrief
After thinking more about my post, I think Warped_Out's system would work better. If I was able to add multiple account/password hashes, I could add the server bans of other admins I trust.
|
Ya mutiple accout/password hashes would be very useful.
__________________
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." -Benjamin Franklin
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|